BlackTerror2536 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Visual Description: The vanishing American hobby.
DRACEA = ARCADE, TRUFOH = FOURTH, BRELHA = HERBAL, STCOKE = SOCKET, KREAMT = MARKET, WUTOIT = OUTWIT — Giving us: REFTHALSOCMKTOT
Clue/Question: He was missing some components from his model train set because he’d – – –
A model railway based on a fictional location in the United States. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Answer: LOST TRACK OF THEM
(It’s quickly becoming a lost art. I remember a good number of guys who had great model train setups, when I was a kid. Now, they’re getting harder and harder to find, especially those great O Guage trains from Lionel. No new clue words today, but most of the jumbles are new. We’ve seen “trufoh” before. I had a little trouble getting “herbal”. The answer letter layout was masterful. A beautiful jumble. Fun cartoon too. Be well and do good, friends.) — YUR
Related articles
- Toledo train station marks its 65th year (toledoblade.com)
- Choo Choo Crash Bang! The Golden Age of Juvenile Trainwrecking (truecrime.io9.com)
- Fire Rages Through Former Model Train Store (patch.com)
- Inside the diets of Victoria’s Secret Angels (uk.businessinsider.com)
- A Wake-up Call To Millennials – You Need To Stop Saving For “Retirement” (edaccessible.com)
- Fluoridation Fails African Americans and Hispanics (press-releases-news.com)
- Study: Americans Likely To Receive At Least One Medical Misdiagnosis (hereandnow.wbur.org)
- Forever And Ever: The Infinite Spiral Loop Model Train Set (geekologie.com)
- Choo-Choo! Model Train | WW w/LINKY (heartfeltbalancehandmadelife.com)
- Toy Soldiers: War Chest is a delightful take on tower defense (dailydot.com)
Unclerave's Wordy Weblog 
Why dont we get sunday jumble early on Sunday?
Sometimes I’ve got the time, Carl, and other times I don’t. If I go out to watch my Bills it’s usually going to be delayed. This week they weren’t even on TV, only Yahoo Livestream, so I was able to post it earlier.
— YUR
Improper English? Wouldn’t it be he’d lose track of them. He’d is a contraction for he would. Therefore not would be He would lose track of them NOT he would lost track of them
Jimmy,
He’d is also an acceptable contraction for “he had”. So, no. it’s not improper English. English has SO many exceptions to its rules. I’m just so glad it’s my native tongue, and I don’t have to learn it as a second language. I would, undoubtedly, get frustrated and quit!
— YUR