Image by mashleymorgan via Flickr
It’s really very simple. And, it’s something that millions of Americans have been asking for, for a very long time. Conduct an independent, non-partisan, impartial investigation of the events of 9/11/2001.
They did not treat the World Trade Center, or the Pentagon, or Shanksville PA as they should have – as a CRIME SCENE. No. President Bush and Co. decided it was much better to DECLARE WAR on the “systematic use of terror as a policy” in order to forego what is expected in a modern democratic society.
The “investigations” – if you can honestly call them that – that they did do were far from independent. They ignored many questions, and did not adequately answer many others. And, even these “investigations” were done under duress.
Instead of relying on the hollow rhetoric of Ahmadinejad’s remarks being “inexcusable”, “offensive”, and “hateful” – and walking out on his speech in a gesture of mock outrage – why not prove him wrong?
Maybe . . . because they can’t? It’s more likely that they just can’t afford for him to be proven correct.
— YUR
Unclerave's Wordy Weblog 
Prove Ahmadinejad Wrong – How?
Published September 24, 2010 Commentary , Current Events , Government , Media 5 CommentsTags: 9/11, Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama
Image by mashleymorgan via Flickr
It’s really very simple. And, it’s something that millions of Americans have been asking for, for a very long time. Conduct an independent, non-partisan, impartial investigation of the events of 9/11/2001.
They did not treat the World Trade Center, or the Pentagon, or Shanksville PA as they should have – as a CRIME SCENE. No. President Bush and Co. decided it was much better to DECLARE WAR on the “systematic use of terror as a policy” in order to forego what is expected in a modern democratic society.
The “investigations” – if you can honestly call them that – that they did do were far from independent. They ignored many questions, and did not adequately answer many others. And, even these “investigations” were done under duress.
Instead of relying on the hollow rhetoric of Ahmadinejad’s remarks being “inexcusable”, “offensive”, and “hateful” – and walking out on his speech in a gesture of mock outrage – why not prove him wrong?
Maybe . . . because they can’t? It’s more likely that they just can’t afford for him to be proven correct.
— YUR
Related Articles